l5_mosfets
- TFE4152 - Lecture 5
- MOSFET’s
- Goal for today
- Intrinsic gain
- Bulk voltage
- \(C_{gs}\) and \(C_{gd}\)
- \(C_{sb}\) and \(C_{db}\)
- or subthreshold
- \(g_m/I_D\) or “bang for the buck”
- As we make transistors smaller, we find new effects that matter, and that must be modelled.
- Unit size transistors for analog design
- Unit transistor layout
TFE4152 - Lecture 5
MOSFET’s
Source
Week | Book | Monday | Book | Friday |
---|---|---|---|---|
34 | Introduction, what are we going to do in this course. Why do you need it? | WH 1 , WH 15 | Manufacturing of integrated circuits | |
35 | CJM 1.1 | pn Junctions | CJM 1.2 WH 1.3, 2.1-2.4 | Mosfet transistors |
36 | CJM 1.2 WH 1.3, 2.1-2.4 | Mosfet transistors | CJM 1.3 - 1.6 | Modeling and passive devices |
37 | Guest Lecture - Sony | CJM 3.1, 3.5, 3.6 | Current mirrors | |
38 | CJM 3.2, 3.3,3.4 3.7 | Amplifiers | CJM, CJM 2 WH 1.5 | SPICE simulation and layout |
39 | Verilog | Verilog | ||
40 | WH 1.4 WH 2.5 | CMOS Logic | WH 3 | Speed |
41 | WH 4 | Power | WH 5 | Wires |
42 | WH 6 | Scaling Reliability and Variability | WH 8 | Gates |
43 | WH 9 | Sequencing | WH 10 | Datapaths - Adders |
44 | WH 10 | Datapaths - Multipliers, Counters | WH 11 | Memories |
45 | WH 12 | Packaging | WH 14 | Test |
46 | Guest lecture - Nordic Semiconductor | |||
47 | CJM | Recap of CJM | WH | Recap of WH |
Goal for today
- Low frequency model
- High frequency model
- Subthreshold operation
-
Velocity saturation
- Other effects
- DIBL
- WPE
- Stress
- Gate current
- Breakdown effects
Low frequency model
\(g_{m} = \frac{\partial I_{DS}}{\partial V_{GS}}\\)
\(g_{ds} = \frac{1}{r_{ds}} = \frac{\partial I_{DS}}{\partial V_{DS}}\\)
Transconductance (\(g_m\))
Define \(\ell = \mu_n C_{ox} \frac{W}{L}\) and \(V_{eff} = V_{GS} - V_{tn}\)
\(I_{D} = \frac{1}{2} \ell (V_{eff})^2\) and \(V_{eff} = \sqrt{\frac{2I_{D}}{\ell}}\) and \(\ell = \frac{2I_D}{V_{eff}^2}\)
\[g_m = \frac{ \partial I_{DS}} {\partial V_{GS}} = \ell V_{eff} = \sqrt{2 \ell I_{D}}\] \[g_m = \ell V_{eff} = 2 \frac{I_D}{V_{eff}^2} V_{eff} = \frac{2 I_D}{V_{eff}}\]Define \(\ell = \mu_n C_{ox} \frac{W}{L}\) and \(V_{eff} = V_{GS} - V_{tn}\)
\[I_D = \frac{1}{2} \ell V_{eff}^2[1 + \lambda V_{DS} - \lambda V_{eff})]\] \[\frac{1}{r_{ds}} = g_{ds} = \frac{ \partial I_D}{\partial V_{DS} } = \lambda \frac{1}{2} \ell V_{eff}^2\]Assume channel length modulation is not there, then
\(I_D = \frac{1}{2} \ell V_{eff}^2\) which means \(\frac{1}{r_{ds}} = g_{ds} \approx \lambda I_D\)
Intrinsic gain
Define intrinsic gain as
\[A = \left|\frac{v_{out}}{v_{in}}\right| = g_m r_{ds} = \frac{g_m}{g_{ds}}\] \[A = \frac{2 I_D}{V_{eff}} \times \frac{1}{ \lambda I_D } = \frac{2}{\lambda V_{eff}}\]vgaini = Gate Source Voltage = \(V_{eff} + V_{tn}\)
Body Effect
Bulk voltage
Param | Voltage [V] |
---|---|
VGS | 0.5 |
VDS | 1.0 |
VS | 0 |
VB | -1.0 to 0.3 |
\(\gamma = \frac{ \sqrt{ 2 q N_A K_{si} \epsilon_0}}{C_{ox}}\) \(\Phi_F = V_T ln\left(\frac{N_A}{n_i}\right)\)
\[V_{SB} = 0, V_{tn} = V_{tn0}\] \[V_{SB} > 0, V_{tn} > V_{tn0}\] \[V_{SB} < 0, V_{tn} < V_{tn0}\]High frequency model
\(C_{gs}\) and \(C_{gd}\)
\[C_{gs} = \begin{cases} WLC_{ox} & \text{if }V_{DS} = 0 \\[15pt] \frac{2}{3}WLC_{ox} & \text{if }V_{DS} > V_{eff} \\[15pt] \end{cases}\] \[C_{gd} = C_{ox} W L_{ov}\]\(C_{sb}\) and \(C_{db}\)
Both are depletion capacitances, ref lecture 3
\[C_{sb} = (A_s + A_{ch}) C_{js}\] \[C_{js} = \frac{C_{j0}}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{V_{SB}}{\Phi_0}}}\] \[\Phi_0 = V_T ln\left(\frac{N_A N_D}{n_i^2}\right)\] \[C_{db} = A_d C_{jd}\] \[C_{js} = \frac{C_{j0}}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{V_{DB}}{\Phi_0}}}\]Be careful with \(C_{gd}\) (blame Miller)
You will derive Miller theorem in the future (p 169)
If \(Y(s) = 1/sC\) then \(Y_1(s) = 1/sC_{in}\) and \(Y_2(s) = 1/sC_{out}\) where \(C_{in} = (1 + A) C\), \(C_{out} = (1 + \frac{1}{2})C\)
\[C_{1} = C_{gd} g_{m} r_{ds}\]\(C_{gd}\) can appear to be 10 to 100 times larger!
if gain from input to output is large
Weak inversion
or subthreshold
If \(V_{eff} < 0\) diffusion currents dominate.
\(I_{D} = I_{D0} \frac{W}{L} e^{V_eff / n V_T}\), where
\(V_T = kT/q\), \(n = (C_{ox} + C_{j0})/C_{ox}\)
\[I_{D0} = (n - 1) \mu_n C_{ox} V_T^2\] \[g_m = \frac{I_D}{nV_T}\]\(g_m/I_D\) or “bang for the buck”
Subthreshold:
\[\frac{g_m}{I_D} = \frac{1}{nV_T} \approx 25.6 \text{ [S/A] @ 300 K}\]Strong inversion:
\[\frac{g_m}{I_D} = \frac{2}{V_{eff}}\]Velocity saturation
Electron speed limit in silicon
\[v \approx 10^7 cm/s\] \[v = \mu_n E = \mu_n \frac{dV}{dx}\]\(\mu_n \approx 100 \text{ to } 600 \text{ } cm^2/Vs\) in nanoscale CMOS
Square law model
\[Q(x) = C_{ox}\left[V_{eff} - V(x)\right]\] \[v = \mu_n E = \mu_n \frac{dV}{dx}\] \[\ell = \mu_n C_{ox} \frac{W}{L}\] \[I_{D} = W Q(x) v = \ell L \left[ V_{eff} - V(x)\right] \frac{dV}{dx}\] \[I_{D} dx = \ell L \left[ V_{eff} - V(x)\right] dV\] \[I_{D} \int_0^L{dx} = \ell L \int_0^{V_{DS}}{\left[ V_{eff} - V(x)\right] dV}\] \[I_{D} \left[x\right]_0^L = \ell L \left[V_{eff}V - \frac{1}{2}V^2\right]_0^{V_{DS}}\] \[I_{D} L = \ell L \left[V_{eff}V_{DS} - \frac{1}{2} V_{DS}^2\right]\] \[@ V_{DS} = V_{eff} \Rightarrow I_{D} = \frac{1}{2} \ell V_{eff}^2\]Mobility Degredation
Multiple effects degrade mobility
- Velocity saturation
- Vertical fields reduce channel depth => more charge-carrier scattering
From square law \(g_{m} = \frac{\partial I_{D}}{\partial V_{GS}} = \ell V_{eff}\)
With mobility degredation \(g_{m(mob-deg)} = \frac{\ell}{2 \theta}\)
What about holes (PMOS)
In PMOS holes are the charge-carrier.
\[\mu_p < \mu_n\]In intrinsic silicon: \(\mu_n \leq 1400 [cm^2/Vs] = 0.14 [m^2/Vs]\) \(\mu_p \leq 450 [cm^2/Vs] = 0.045 [m^2/Vs]\)
\[\mu_n \approx 3\mu_p\]\(v_{n\_max} \approx 2.3 \times 10^5 [m/s]\) \(v_{p\_max} \approx 1.6 \times 10^5 [m/s]\)
Doping (\(N_A \text{or} N_D\)) reduces \(\mu\)
Assume we want same current in strong inversion and active region
What should \(\frac{W_p}{W_n}\) be?
OTHER
As we make transistors smaller, we find new effects that matter, and that must be modelled.
which is an opportunity for engineers to come up with cool names
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5247174
Drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL)
Well Proximity Effect (WPE)
Stress effects
Stress | PMOS | NMOS |
---|---|---|
Stretch Fz | Good | Good |
Compress Fy | OK | Good |
Compress Fx | Good | Bad |
What can change stress?
Gate current
Hot carrier injection
Channel initiated secondary-electron (CHISEL)
Analog Design Recommendations
Unit size transistors for analog design
\(W/L \in[4, 6, 10]\), but should have space for two contacts
Use parallell transistors for larger W/L
Amplifiers \(L = 1.2 \times L_{min}\)
Current mirrors \(L = 4 \times L_{min}\)
Choose sizes that have been used by foundry for measurement to match SPICE model
Unit transistor layout
Use 2 fingers (parallel transistors)
Never rotate transistors
Make sure bulk is close